USF 678 Effective Technology Integration into Lessons and Curriculum
This course gave me new perspectives into how design the curriculum in my classes and new approaches to utilizing the technologies I have available to me. Specifically the time we spent investigating Project Based Learning and how to properly design a Project Based Learning experience was very helpful.
The Backward Design concept will be one that I use as I begin retooling my curriculum.
3 stages of Backward Design1. Desired Outcomes 2. Acceptable Evidence 3. Learning activities
By starting with the end in mind, I will be able to create learning activities that are more impactful towards meeting the learning goals.
The following is a summary of what I got out of each module:
MODULE 2 - Tech Ed tool investigation
Module 3
In module 3 I took a deep dive into EdImagine and David Conley’s work on developing college and career readiness skills. Conley breaks down post-secondary readiness into 4 key components:- Think - problem formulation, research, interpretation, communication, precision/accuracy
- Know - Structure of knowledge, Attitudes toward learning, foundational knowledge/skills
- Act - Learning skills & techniques, Ownership of learning, learning techniques.
- Go - college choice/fit, reasoning for attending, financial aid, college culture, self-advocacy
In Conley’s, Keynote at 2012 Oregon education Association Education Symposium, he discusses the importance to “Get more students ready to succeed in college and career… not just achieve a score on a test.” Workers need to be able to formulate problems, not just answer a problem that is given to them. In doing so they need to collect information, interpret data, and come to a solution with accuracy. There is a process that needs to be taught in school on how to become problem solvers.
While Conley does not specifically speak to Project Based Learning, his philosophies lend to the the theory of project based learning. Students gain knowledge and skills as they are working to answer a larger authentic question. This parallels what happens in the workforce and is a skill that is transferable to any industry.
Conley spoke about how the traditional learning system is linear. You learn 1 skill that builds on another skill and so on until you acquire all the skills a class requires. Conley proposes to change that model to one that Looks at the big picture first and develop learning around the accomplishment of of the big picture goal. This is strikingly similar to the Project Based Learning model.
This deep dive struck me as part of the CTE department we are focused on creating life-long learners and giving students opportunities to apply their learning to the real world. I appreciate Conley’s approach that a students knowledge/skill level in a given area are not permanent. They have room to grow. 21st century workers need to have a broad range of skills and must be able to adjust during their career to learn new skills. According to Conley, teaching the skill of learning should be a top priority in schools. Students today will work in many different occupations throughout their lives. Knowing the process of learning a new skill will be vital for their flexibility in future employment opportunities.
Module 4 /5 Project Based Learning
Project based learning vs Doing Projects in class
In these modules, I was able to take time to investigate what project based learning is and isn't and practice the thought process of designing a project based learning experience.
Linked below is a self paced Intro to Project Based Learning in-service that I designed for these modules.
Intro to Project Based Learning - Presentation | PBL - Planning Worksheet
MODULE 5 DISCUSSION - FLIPPING THE CLASSROOM
- Think - problem formulation, research, interpretation, communication, precision/accuracy
- Know - Structure of knowledge, Attitudes toward learning, foundational knowledge/skills
- Act - Learning skills & techniques, Ownership of learning, learning techniques.
- Go - college choice/fit, reasoning for attending, financial aid, college culture, self-advocacy
In Conley’s, Keynote at 2012 Oregon education Association Education Symposium, he discusses the importance to “Get more students ready to succeed in college and career… not just achieve a score on a test.” Workers need to be able to formulate problems, not just answer a problem that is given to them. In doing so they need to collect information, interpret data, and come to a solution with accuracy. There is a process that needs to be taught in school on how to become problem solvers.
While Conley does not specifically speak to Project Based Learning, his philosophies lend to the the theory of project based learning. Students gain knowledge and skills as they are working to answer a larger authentic question. This parallels what happens in the workforce and is a skill that is transferable to any industry.
Conley spoke about how the traditional learning system is linear. You learn 1 skill that builds on another skill and so on until you acquire all the skills a class requires. Conley proposes to change that model to one that Looks at the big picture first and develop learning around the accomplishment of of the big picture goal. This is strikingly similar to the Project Based Learning model.
This deep dive struck me as part of the CTE department we are focused on creating life-long learners and giving students opportunities to apply their learning to the real world. I appreciate Conley’s approach that a students knowledge/skill level in a given area are not permanent. They have room to grow. 21st century workers need to have a broad range of skills and must be able to adjust during their career to learn new skills. According to Conley, teaching the skill of learning should be a top priority in schools. Students today will work in many different occupations throughout their lives. Knowing the process of learning a new skill will be vital for their flexibility in future employment opportunities.
Module 4 /5 Project Based Learning
Project based learning vs Doing Projects in class
In these modules, I was able to take time to investigate what project based learning is and isn't and practice the thought process of designing a project based learning experience.
Linked below is a self paced Intro to Project Based Learning in-service that I designed for these modules.
Intro to Project Based Learning - Presentation | PBL - Planning Worksheet
MODULE 5 DISCUSSION - FLIPPING THE CLASSROOM
MODULE 6 DIFFERENTIATION / GRANT WRITING
In the discussion we were asked to pick a definition of differentiation that we liked the most
I am choosing the definition by ASCD:
Differentiation is a teacher's reacting responsively to a learner's needs.
By using this definition, I have been differentiating instruction my whole career. We may not have called it by this name 20 years ago but working with students and adjusting learning paths and strategies has always been part of my teaching philosophy and practice. My goal is to have students leave my classroom at the end of the semester as more efficient technology users no matter the path or sequence they complete the tasks.
Over the summer, I have been planning out a way for students to choose their own path in my computer courses. Similar to the “Playlist” in the Cult of Pedagogy blog I am using google docs to create a hyperdoc for each of my 6 units. Students will be given the opportunity to choose which order to accomplish the learning objectives of the class. By watching instructional videos and completing formative assessments activities the students will be able to gain the skills for each unit at their own pace.
Grant Writing
I was amazed to find the vast amount of options available for grants. This section of the module helped me gather my thoughts on where I have needs in my class and where I can go to seek out monetary assistance.
Module 7 - 1:1 Integration
As a computer education teacher, I have taught in a 1:1 classroom for my entire career. These are the issues I have encountered over the years.
- Devices are a distraction. While it may be difficult at times to catch students attention in a traditional classroom, putting devices in front of them with the whole internet at their fingertips makes catching their attention during presentations even more difficult. My solutions:
- Teach from the back of the room. I have learned to arrange my classroom in the back of the room so I can see all of their screens when I am demonstrating new skills. From this vantage point I can see almost every students screen and know they are on the same application as me and are performing the tasks that I am demonstrating.
- Verbal Cues. When I really need them to focus and lock in on a specific skill. I will walk to the front of the room and say “Let me see your eyes”. I wait until every student is physically looking at me before I continue with my next point. Lots of times the students think they already know everything in my class. I use this verbal clue to let them know that what I am about to show them is new and important. I also use the cue “hold onto your hats, cause I am about to blow your mind.” This is another cue that what I am about to teach something new that they will want to make sure they hear.
- Time Management. I have found that in computer classroom the devices make staying on task difficult for some students. The culprits are usually easily identified early in the semester when assignments are not being turned in consistently.
- I use proximity cues and adjustments in seating charts to put them closer to where I am so I can keep them on task.
- Administrative Software. I have technology in my room to view the activities of the students. If there is a particular website that they are accessing, I will block that website to try to remove the distraction along with having a conversation about time management.
- Devices as a Resource. This is the Good of 1:1. I have found having devices is more good than bad. The devices are a great resource for students that finish early to work on other classes or explore a application tool at a deeper level. I treat this time as a reward. If you do your work and get done early, the rest of the class is yours.
For this section we had to make a STUDENT TECHNOLOGY AGREEMENT. Here is the Technology Agreement I created for my classes.
Module 8 - Fake News
Here are a few tips that I got from the readings and my own experiences that I would give my students when testing the validity of a source:
1. Check the URL. In the Washington Post article they showed the example of a website that looked like ABC News. But the URL did not match an official ABC News URL and in reality the url indicated the website was based in Columbia.
2. This is my own suggestion: Does the headline match the majority of the Article? I find a lot of articles that come across my social media news feed or google news feed that have headlines that have Outlandish statements but when you actually read the article only a small portion of the article talks about the headline and the headline is written out of context. To me that would be a suggestion that the author had ulterior motive to their article most likely to put a political cause or person in a negative light.
3. Check other Sources. If you find an source tends to skew to the right or left of the political spectrum. Seek out an alternative source from the other side of the political spectrum. News organizations have been pretty clear the last decade as to which side of the spectrum they sit. Want a conservative perspective look at Foxnews. Need a liberal perspective seek out CNN. See both sides of the argument and find the ‘truth’ probably somewhere in the middle.
